Guide
Three pricing models, the costs that never appear on the invoice, and the one number that lets you compare options that are not otherwise comparable.
Last reviewed August 2026
The short answer
White-label Shopify implementation is sold three ways: hourly, per project, or on a monthly plan. Junymo sells hours on a monthly subscription, from $100 an hour at 2 hours a month down to $62 at 100, with unused hours rolling over for as long as you are subscribed. Month to month, no contract.
Comparing a monthly rate to an hourly one by looking at the headline number is meaningless. The comparable figure is cost per shipped request, and it has to include the time your team spends scoping, quoting, chasing and reworking. For most agencies that hidden overhead is larger than the invoice.
These are not variations on a theme. They put the risk in different places and they reward different behaviour from whoever is doing the work.
| Model | Billed | Predictable? | Per-request overhead | What it rewards |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hourly | Per hour worked | No | Quote and approve every request | Rewards slower work |
| Per project | Per scoped deliverable | Per project, not per month | Scoping call before anything starts | Rewards padding the estimate |
| Monthly hours | A block of hours each month, scoped per task | Yes, you choose the number | None after onboarding | Rewards shipping faster |
Whatever you pay a developer is only part of what the work costs you. The rest lands on your own team, and it is usually the larger number:
None of these appear when you compare an hourly rate to a monthly rate, which is exactly why that comparison misleads.
Take a real month. Count the Shopify requests that actually went live, not the ones that were discussed. Then divide everything you spent getting them there, including your own team's hours, by that count.
cost per shipped request = (what you paid + your team's hours on it) / requests actually delivered
It is a blunt measure and it is still better than any other, because it is the only one that survives a change of pricing model. Run it on last quarter before you talk to anyone.
The rate falls as the monthly commitment rises, because reserved capacity is cheaper to deliver than ad hoc capacity. At Junymo, four points along that curve:
5 hours
$95
an hour
15 hours
$86
an hour
40 hours
$75
an hour
100 hours
$62
an hour
The flip side, stated plainly: you are billed every month whether you send work or not. The difference from a traditional retainer is that the hours do not disappear when you do not use them. A quiet month banks hours against a busy one rather than burning them, which is the usual objection to this model and the specific thing this one is built to answer.
Four things drive the number up or down, whatever the model:
On market rates
We have deliberately not published a table of what other providers charge. Rates in this market move, vary by region and are frequently quoted before scope is understood, so a number here would be stale or misleading within a quarter.
Get quotes from two or three providers, then convert each one to cost per shipped request using the method above. That comparison is worth more than any published range, including ours.
Hours on a monthly plan, from 2 hours at $100 an hour up to 100 hours at $62. Every task is scoped in hours and confirmed before work starts, never after, with a one hour minimum. Unused hours roll over for as long as you are subscribed and survive plan changes, so a slow month is not money burned. Tasks scoped at 4 hours or under come back in 2 business days, two are worked at a time, and every one gets a QA pass and a walkthrough. Month to month, cancel any time, and the first task is refunded if you are not happy with it.
No per-request quoting and no negotiation before each small job, which removes the scoping overhead described above rather than moving it around. Full detail on the pricing page, and the scope boundary is on the white-label Shopify development page.
If you are still deciding between a partner, a freelancer and a hire, the comparison of all three covers the trade-offs that are not about money.